Name: Hariyani Kishan .R.
Semester: 2
Paper No: 7 Literary Theory & Criticism.
Roll No: 21
Enrollment No: PG15101021
Submitted To: Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar
University
Year: 2016
Figurative Language by I. A .Richards
· Introduction:
I.A Richards, Who’s full name was Ivor
Armstrong Richards, who was one of the most influential figure among the
critics of the 20th Century. He was born on February 26,
1893, Sandbank, Cheshire, England and also died on September 7, 1979,
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, lived very long time and did also very notable
things in the history of English Criticism. He was an English critic and poet.
While a lecturer at Cambridge, Richards wrote influential works,
including Principles of Literary Criticism (1924), in which he
introduced a new way of reading poetry that led to the New Criticism. A
student of psychology, He took education at Cambridge. In fact, T.S. Eliot and I.A.Richards are
considered to be the pioneers in the field of New Criticism. They differ a lot in the views. Critics like
John
Crowe Ronsom, Kenneth Brooke, cleanth Brooks, R.P.Blackmur, and
Robert Penn Warren William Empson were in debted to I.A.Richards.
That period he wrote three of his most influential books: The Meaning of meaning (1923) a pioneer work on semantics and Principles of Literary Criticism (1924) and Practical Criticism (1929), companion volumes that he used to develop his critical method. The latter two were based on experimental pedagogy: Richards would give students poems in which the titles and authors’ names had been removed and then use their responses for further development of their close reading skills. Richards is best known for advancing the close reading of literature and for articulating the theoretical principles upon which
That period he wrote three of his most influential books: The Meaning of meaning (1923) a pioneer work on semantics and Principles of Literary Criticism (1924) and Practical Criticism (1929), companion volumes that he used to develop his critical method. The latter two were based on experimental pedagogy: Richards would give students poems in which the titles and authors’ names had been removed and then use their responses for further development of their close reading skills. Richards is best known for advancing the close reading of literature and for articulating the theoretical principles upon which
these skills lead to “practical
criticism,” a method of increasing readers’analyticpowers.
A student of psychology
and philosophy along with literary forms, Richards concluded that
poetry performs a therapeutic function by coordinating a variety of human
impulses into an aesthetic whole, helping both the writer and the reader
maintain their psychological well-being. He valued poetry of inclusion that was
able to contain the widest variety of warring tensions and oppositions.
I.A Richards is remembered today for his
notable works as enlisted below:
1. The Meaning of Meaning- 1923
2. The Practical of Criticism – 1929
3. The Principles of Literary criticism-1924
I.A.Richards differs from the New Critics in
one important respect, while the New Critics limit themselves rigorously to the
poem under consideration, I.A.Richards also take into account its effect on the
readers. For him, the real value of a poem lies in the reaction and
attitudes it creates weather or not it is conductive to greater emotional
balance equilibrium, peace and rest in the mind of the readers. For him the
value of a work of art lies in its power to harmonies and organizes complex and
warring human impulses into patterns that are lasting and pleasurable.
In his work I.A. Richards discusses about the figurative language
as well as metaphorical language, which was an orthodox advocate of a close
textual and verbal study and analysis of work of verbal study and analysis of
work of art. According to Richards there are three objectves to write The
Practical criticism.
Ø Four kinds of meanings:
According to him the poet writes to communicate, and language is
the means of that Communication Language is made of words and therefore it is a
study of words is all important if the meaning of work of art is understood.
Words carry four kind of meaning sense, Feelings Tone and intention, which are
enlisted below
Let’s discuss these
four kinds of meanings in detail.
Ø Sense:
Sense is very much important in the any work of art or literature. Here
Sense deals with the simple as well as plain meanings of any literary work
according to I.A Richards. Because Sense is an integral element of the poetry
due to it one can understand the entire meaning of the poem. By sense it
meant something that is communicated by the plain literal meanings of the
words. About Sense one scholar comments
“In most poetry the sense is as important as anything
else;
It is quite as a subtle, and as dependent of the syntax
as in
Prose; it is the poet’s chief instrument to other aims
when it is not
Itself his aim. His control of our thoughts is ordinarily
his chief means to the
Control of our feeling, and in the immense majority of
instances we miss nearly everything"
Ø Feelings:
Feelings are very much necessary for the poet
and for the reader also because one is able to grasp the meaning but if he
cannot understand the feelings of the poet or what the poet wants to convey his
or her ideas through words then the poet fails in the field of poetry. Feeling
Refers to emotional attitudes desire,
will, pleasure, unpleasure and the rest words express feelings.
Ø Tone:
As far as Tone is concerned, it is equally
required in the poetry that tone should be there in any literary work. Tone
deals with the tone of the poet because sometimes it is possible that tone
helps us to understand the meanings of the poem. Tone here means the
writers attitude towards his audience. The writer chooses his words and arranges
them keeping in mind the taste of his readers. Feeling is only state of
mind.
Ø Intention:
Intention deals with the purpose of the poet.
Due to Intention reader sometimes cannot or fails to grasp the meaning of the
poetry. Many times it is observed that what the poet wants to say one cannot
understand the entire poetry. Intention is authors conscious or unconscious
aim, it is the effect that one tries to produce. Also intention controls the
emphasis, shapes the arrangement, or draws attention to something of importance.
After discussing four kinds of meanings then
I.A Richards proceeds further to convey his idea about Importance of Rhyme and Rhythm.I.A. Richards by his own work could make literary
Criticism factual, Scientific and complete. It no longer remains a matter of
the application of set ruler the New Critics everywhere.Words in poetry have an
emotive value and the figurative
language used by poets conveys those emotions effectively and forcefully.
Ø Significance of Rhyme and Rhythm:
Rhythm and Metre are organic and integral and
important parts of any integral and important parts of any poem because they
determine the meaning of the words used by the poets Rhythm, meter and meaning
cannot be separated they from together a single system. Rhythm and its specialized form, meter,
depend upon repetition and expectancy. Equally where what is expected
recurs and where it fails, all rhythmical and metrical effects spring from
anticipation.
Ø The Nature of poetic Truth:
Metaphorical language is important purpose of
communication. The Nature of poetic Truth is very much important but it differs
from the scientific truth.“It is evident that the bulk of poetry consists of
statements which only the very foolish would think of attempting to verify.very
special combinations so as to correspond to the ways in which things actually
hang together, can be either true or false and most references in poetry are
not knit together in this way.
Ø Source of Misunderstanding in Poetry:
In practical criticism a study of literary
judgment, I.A.Richards has given the theory of Figurative language. He starts
discussion first on sources of misunderstanding in poetry. He says that it is
very difficult to find the source which creates misunderstanding. Further, he
says that there are four sources of misunderstanding as far as are poetry is
concerned. According to I.A. Richards there are four sources of
misunderstanding of poetry. It is difficult to diagnose with accuracy and
definiteness, the source of some particular mistake or misunderstanding of the
sense of poetry. It arises from inattention, or sheer carelessness.
Ø The Value of Figurative Language:
Sometimes it is possible that figurative
language may create some misunderstanding in any literary work. Therefore it is
necessary to identify the figures of speech. It is difficult to turn
poetry into logical respectable prose. Is combining with recognition of the
liberties which are proper for a poet, and the power and value of figurative
language.There are various comments on the above piece of the hyperbole of the
sea-harp. The only concrete simile in the octave is the likening of the sea to
a harp- surely a little extravagant.
Ø The Value of Personification:
Personification is the best way to express
the idea of poet.Bacause personification adds more colours into the language of
poetry. Sometimes it looks like very ornamental language. Personification
comes naturally to us. Personification may not express sense but it expresses
the feelings of the poet towards what he is speaking about. Personification
enables the poet to clear and comprehend the difficult work.
Now about value of Personification I.A Richards comments
There are indeed very good reasons why poetry
should personify. The structure of language and the pronouns, verbs and
adjectives that come most naturally to us constantly invite us to personify.
And to go deeper, our attitudes, feelings, and ways of thought about inanimate
things are moulded upon and grow out of our whys of thinking and feeling about
one another.
·
Conclusion:
In this way we can say that according to I.A Richards a proper
understanding of figurative language required close study of the poem. Reader
should read the poem into the context of close reading. its literal since must
be carefully followed, but such literal reading must not come in the way
of imagination appreciation of it judicious balance must be struck between
literalism and imaginative freedom .and it provide the way of analysis poem and
study of words and metaphor .this kind of Richards’s work provide theory of
study poem.
To evaluate my assignment. click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment